Accelerating the Nuclear Weapons Disarmament Process
A century ago, ensuring world peace was seen as desirable but not entirely necessary. Maintaining peace in your own particular region was the immediate priority and what went on elsewhere had little effect. Today, the availability of weapons of mass destruction through the development of nuclear weapons has meant that every country’s particular region has expanded to include the entire world. To achieve a peaceful world today people and their leaders are recognizing the urgent need to work collaboratively.
The world’s stockpile of nuclear weapons, with the capacity to annihilate civilization many times over, is arguably now the greatest threat to mankind’s existence on earth. Should a conflict occur and nuclear weapons be used, the entire world would have to cope with the consequences. The threat of a conflict that involves countries with large nuclear weapon arsenals is greater than ever, which the Doomsday Clock reflects at the current setting of 100 seconds to midnight.
Threat of nuclear war has motivated the United Nations to seek a legally binding instrument to prohibit nuclear weapons leading to their total elimination. There have been many attempts at international treaties seeking to eliminate or reduce the number of nuclear weapons. The latest Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons came into force on January 22, 2021 (see also Annex A). This is progress to be cheered but we cannot ignore the fact that no country currently in possession, or considered likely to be in possession of nuclear weapons has signed the treaty. The lack of trust between these nuclear armed nations is a serious obstacle to making further process.
In order to make significant progress in a negotiation such as this a clear process is essential. Another criteria normally necessary is for each country to understand the preferences and constraints of the other negotiating countries. In a complex negotiation involving multiple parties and many objective and subjective issues this criteria is hard to achieve and can easily lead to delays and even impasse.
The addition of Smartsettle Infinity to the negotiation not only provides a clear process for complex negotiations but also makes it possible for parties to input their preferences and accurately represent them without revealing them to other parties. Sophisticated optimization algorithms at the secure Smartsettle neutral site make it possible for both tangible and intangible hidden value to be uncovered in order to overcome impasse in very difficult situations. Negotiators are able to efficiently participate remotely and asynchronously.
Smartsettle Resolutions Inc (SRI) as iCan’s marketing arm has modelled numerous high-profile complex negotiations, including the war in Ukraine, Kashland (conflict in Kashmir) (2022), BREXIT (2018) and a Biden/Sanders Coalition (2019). SRI is actively seeking further opportunities to engage in similar highly complex negotiations.
Annex A: Treaty on the prohibition of nuclear weapons
Treaty overview
By resolution 71/258, the General Assembly decided to convene in 2017 a United Nations conference to negotiate a legally binding instrument to prohibit nuclear weapons, leading towards their total elimination. The Assembly encouraged all Member States to participate in the Conference, with the participation and contribution of international organizations and civil society representatives.
The Conference took place from 27 to 31 March and from 15 June to 7 July in New York. The Conference was chaired by Ambassador Elayne Whyte Gómez, Permanent Representative of Costa Rica to the UN Office at Geneva.
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons (TPNW) includes a comprehensive set of prohibitions on participating in any nuclear weapon activities. These include undertakings not to develop, test, produce, acquire, possess, stockpile, use or threaten to use nuclear weapons. The Treaty also prohibits the deployment of nuclear weapons on national territory and the provision of assistance to any State in the conduct of prohibited activities. States parties will be obliged to prevent and suppress any activity prohibited under the TPNW undertaken by persons or on territory under its jurisdiction or control. The Treaty also obliges States parties to provide adequate assistance to individuals affected by the use or testing of nuclear weapons, as well as to take necessary and appropriate measure of environmental remediation in areas under its jurisdiction or control contaminated as a result of activities related to the testing or use of nuclear weapons.
The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons was adopted by the Conference (by a vote of 122 States in favour, with one vote against and one abstention) at the United Nations on 7 July 2017, and opened for signature by the Secretary-General of the United Nations on 20 September 2017. Following the deposit with the Secretary-General of the 50th instrument of ratification or accession of the Treaty on 24 October 2020, it shall enter into force on 22 January 2021 in accordance with its article 15 (1).
There are 193 member states in the United Nations.
Role of the United Nations
By its resolution 72/31 of 4 December 2017, the General Assembly requested the Secretary-General to render the necessary assistance and to provide such services as may be necessary to fulfil the tasks entrusted to him under the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. Under Article 19, the Secretary-General is designated as depository of the Treaty. He is also tasked with the transmission to the States Parties of declarations received pursuant to Article 2 of the Treaty and the convening of Meetings of States Parties and Review Conferences (Article 8).
Background
The initiative to seek a legally binding instrument to prohibit nuclear weapons is an outcome of the discourse centred on promoting greater awareness and understanding of the humanitarian consequences that would result from any use of nuclear weapons.
In recent years, renewed interest in the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons was first manifested in the final document (NPT/CONF.2010/50 (Vol. I)) of the 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. In its conclusions and recommendations for follow-on actions, the Conference expressed its deep concern at the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of any use of nuclear weapons and reaffirmed the need for all States at all times to comply with applicable international law, including international humanitarian law.
In 2012, expressing concern about the catastrophic humanitarian consequences of any use of nuclear weapons, the General Assembly adopted resolution 67/56 entitled “Taking forward multilateral nuclear disarmament negotiations”. By this resolution, the Assembly established in 2013 an open-ended working group to develop proposals to take forward multilateral nuclear disarmament negotiations for the achievement and maintenance of a world without nuclear weapons and the open-ended working group reflected its discussion in its report (A/68/514).
A series of three international conferences on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons, convened in 2013 and 2014 respectively in Norway, Mexico and Austria, sought to present a facts-based understanding of the short and longer-term effects of a nuclear weapon detonation.
These conferences, which included participation by a large majority of States, the International Committee of the Red Cross and hundreds of representatives of non-governmental organizations, principally coordinated by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), played an important role in building demand for urgent action to advance nuclear disarmament negotiations.
A series of three international conferences on the humanitarian impact of nuclear weapons, convened in 2013 and 2014 respectively in Norway, Mexico and Austria, sought to present a facts-based understanding of the short and longer-term effects of a nuclear weapon detonation.
These conferences, which included participation by a large majority of States, the International Committee of the Red Cross and hundreds of representatives of non-governmental organizations, principally coordinated by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), played an important role in building demand for urgent action to advance nuclear disarmament negotiations.